The Roundup

Apr 4, 2011

Watchdog

California's political watchdogs are showing their fangs. The mayor of L.A. gets snared in free sports tickets, and the new chair of the Board of Equalization has some campaign-violation problems.

 

First up, L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's problem, reported by the LAT's David Zahniser: "Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has agreed to pay nearly $42,000 in fines to resolve state and city investigations into his practice of accepting tickets to sports events, concerts and other pricey entertainment activities without reporting them as gifts."

 

"The penalty would be the largest of its kind under California's ethics law if approved by the state Fair Political Practices Commission and the city Ethics Commission."

 

"In a pact drafted by officials with both agencies, Villaraigosa acknowledged that he had failed to report free tickets to 34 events during his first five years in office, including Los Angeles Lakers games and concerts at such venues as Staples Center, L.A. Live and Universal City's Gibson Amphitheatre."

 

"For months, the mayor had insisted that his acceptance of tickets to at least 85 events did not violate state law because at the time he was performing ceremonial duties, such as throwing out the first pitch at a Los Angeles Dodgers game."

 

And now, for Horton, courtesy of the Times' Patrick McGreevy: "The chairman of the state tax board violated campaign finance rules when he didn't disclose his involvement in a contentious Inglewood school board race and faces fines of $13,000, according to state ethics officials."

 

"Jerome Horton, who is chairman of the state Board of Equalization, has admitted to several violations — including diverting his unused campaign money to an aborted state Senate run — in an agreement he signed with the director of the state Fair Political Practices Commission. The commission will meet April 11 to ratify the penalties."

 

"Horton, a former Inglewood city councilman and state assemblyman, was appointed in 2009 to the state Board of Equalization, which collects sales taxes, tobacco and gasoline levies, and other state fees."

 

State lawmakers may be getting their own brand of scrutiny. The independent panel that sets their salaries is taking a look at one of their long-standing perks -- their monthly car allowance, which includes unlimited gasoline.

 

"From the Bee's Jim Sanders: "The perk has withstood the recessionary economy and several rounds of budget-cutting, including $11.2 billion in measures the Legislature approved and Gov. Jerry Brown signed in March."

 

"The cost in relation to California's remaining $15.4 billion budget shortfall is small – less than $1 million a year. Lawmakers say they've done the calculations, and switching to making mileage payments for driving in a large state like California could prove even more expensive."

 

"It nonetheless promises to be a hot topic at the April 14 meeting of the independent commission that sets salaries and benefits for California's statewide elected officials."

 

Speaking of hot topics, nothing is hotter in California than water. And with enormous amounts of water pouring through the Sacramento River on its way to the Pacifc Ocean, Capitol pundits George Skelton and Dan Walters take a look.

 

First, from the LAT's George Skelton: "Let's put it this way: One day last week, the Sacramento River system, including overflow into bypasses, was producing roughly 180,000 cubic feet of water per second. That's the size equivalent of 180,000 basketballs rolling by each second. Put another way, it's around four acre-feet — enough water to supply four families of four for a year — tumbling past Sacramento each second."

"All this water was rolling through the delta into San Francisco Bay and under the Golden Gate to the sea. Why doesn't someone capture the precious bounty for use when an inevitable drought returns?"

 

"We could if we had a place to put it and a way to get it there," says Maury Roos, the state's veteran chief hydrologist."

 

And now, from the Bee's Dan Walters: "In a rational world, the extra flows in this and other high-water seasons would be diverted into what's called "off-stream storage," either into underground aquifers or into reservoirs such as San Luis Reservoir on the Pacheco Pass between Los Banos and Hollister."

 

"However, San Luis, which holds more than 2 million acre-feet, is already full to the brim, and Southern California reservoirs are nearly full."

 

"State water authorities have long called for more off-stream storage to capture high flows. For instance, had the proposed Sites reservoir in western Colusa County been built years ago, as it should have been, it would be absorbing another 2 million acre-feet of water for use in drought years and to stabilize flows on the Sacramento River."

 

"If global warming has the widely predicted effect of reducing snowfall and increasing rain, off-stream storage will become even more critical. But Sites, like other aspects of California water policy, has been tied up in political stalemate for decades. It's not a conflict over water, but rather one of competing visions of how California should develop as it gains population in the 21st century."

 

Proescutors may be in hot water, too: A new study details an array of misconduct in dozens of cases, including intentionally misleading jurors. 

 

From the LAT's Jack Leonard: "California courts last year found that Los Angeles County prosecutors withheld evidence, intentionally misled jurors or committed other types of misconduct in 31 criminal cases, according to an Innocence Project report released last week."

"The decisions involved convictions dating back as far as 1984 and were among 102 California cases in which the group found that courts identified prosecutorial misconduct.

"In 26 of the cases — nine in Los Angeles County — the courts cited the misconduct in decisions to order a new trial, set aside a sentence or bar evidence, according to the Northern California Innocence Project, which is based at the Santa Clara University School of Law."

And finally from our "What's for Breakfast?" file, we find the tale of New Zealand's new breakfast beer, which is intended to help you start the day right. 

"A new beer to be launched in New Zealand's largest city at 7:00am Thursday has been slammed by alcohol watchdogs concerned about its promotion as a "breakfast beer."

"The cherry-flavored wheat lager is described as "a beer the ladies can enjoy too ... if you're having a champagne breakfast but don't fancy champagne, have a beer instead," the New Zealand Herald reported Sunday."

 

"The beer, made by Marlborough brewery Moa, contains 5.5 percent alcohol and will be officially launched at an Auckland cafe this week, but has already been slammed as "irresponsible."

 

But it's more fun than prune juice...

 
Get the daily Roundup
free in your e-mail




The Roundup is a daily look at the news from the editors of Capitol Weekly and AroundTheCapitol.com.
Privacy Policy