The Roundup

Feb 25, 2010

$&*% this...

 


Debra Saunders looks at the stealth campaign of Jerry Brown.

 

"Brown has not faced a competitive race since 1982 when Pete Wilson beat him in a race for the U.S. Senate. Brown later won races for state Democratic Party chairman, Oakland mayor and state attorney general - which means he's won more seats than the rest of us chickens - but running for governor is different. And 2010 is not 1974.

 

"Brown's strength is that he is not a predictable liberal. Alas, that's because his positions can be fickle and self-serving. As party chairman, he set a record in nonelection year fundraising in 1989; by 1992, he was a money virgin who wanted to limit campaign contributions to $100.

 

"As Bob Stern also noted, the general election against Whitman could be a complete toss-up: "We don't know what kind of campaigner she'll be. We don't know what kind of a campaigner he'll be."

 

But we've got an idea of how entertaining the whole thing could be...

 

George Skelton, for one, doesn't like what he sees thus far, denouncing the distortion and demagoguery governor's race.

 

"Republican front-runner Meg Whitman, at least, is feinting toward substance, even if avoiding tricky details. The rap on her is that she stretches the truth.

That's not uncommon among political candidates. But it doesn't mean they shouldn't be called on it, especially in Whitman's case. Practically all we know about her thoughts for governing this broken state is what we hear or see in her ads. For months, she has ducked California reporters and, until very recently, spoken only to friendly, handpicked audiences, if at all.

 

As for Democrats calling for Whitman's tax returns, Skelton writes, "Let's be honest: This really is about class warfare, pitting the day-to-day strugglers against the super wealthy. It's old-fashioned populism. It's also about knocking the opponent around and hopefully off balance."

 

Seema Mehta reports the U.S. Senate candidates tangled over Israel Wednesday.

 

"Rivals in the race for the Republican nomination are questioning whether former Rep. Tom Campbell is sufficiently supportive of Israel. They base their criticisms on his voting record, statements about a Palestinian homeland and capital, and some of his past associates.

Their allegations have raised enough concerns for Campbell that he plans to meet Monday with the influential American Israel Public Affairs Committee. He also is reaching out to other Jewish leaders. His campaign's honorary chairman, former U.S. Secretary of State George P. Shultz, weighed in to call Campbell's support for the nation "unwavering."

"He clearly understands the very real threats facing the Israeli people, all the more urgent now as Iran rushes toward nuclear arms," Shultz said in a statement released to The Times. "Tom Campbell's record of action tells you where he stands, and I stand with him."

 

Capitol Weekly reports a new memo from Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) is aimed at the behavior of legislative staff.

 

"The memo apparently grew out of a recent incident involving a tax conformity bill by Sen. Lois Wolk and some moderate members of the Democratic caucus. That led some members to grumble the memo was an effort to muzzle the mods -- similar to Don Perata’s infamous lock-out of Mod Caucus members in 2007. Others argue it will lead to Big Brother-like policing of staff conversations on the Senate floor. Steinberg’s staff says those fears are overblown, and that this memo is just a gentle reminder to members that they, not their staff, have been elected to serve their constituents.

 

Read the memo here.

 

Margot Roosevelt looks at widespread fraud in the state's smog-check program.

 

"Nearly a third of older-model cars stopped for roadside smog tests in Southern California failed them, despite having received a passing grade at inspection stations within a year, a state audit has found.

The results of those surprise inspections of 6,000 models manufactured before 1996 have led law enforcement officials to crack down on unscrupulous stations, step up fines and file more criminal charges."

 

And finally, the Assembly may not know which bills they're voting on at times, but that's no reason to cuss. Assemblyman Anthony Portantino has introduced a measure that would create a "cuss-free week" in California.

 

AP's Robin Hindrey reports, "The state Assembly is scheduled to vote on a resolution Thursday calling for a statewide "Cuss Free Week," to occur annually during the first week of March. If approved, it would go to the state Senate for a final vote on Monday.

 

"The rest of next week will be officially swear-word free if both houses approve the resolution.

 

"The resolution by Assemblyman Anthony Portantino, D-La Canada Flintridge, was inspired by a South Pasadena teenager, McKay Hatch, who founded a No Cussing Club at his junior high school in 2007. His efforts to stamp out profanity have generated international attention, with 35,000 members joining the No Cussing Club's Web site."

 

We say, why stop there? We've got ten other ways in which the Legislature could be more like junion high school...

 
Get the daily Roundup
free in your e-mail




The Roundup is a daily look at the news from the editors of Capitol Weekly and AroundTheCapitol.com.
Privacy Policy