The Roundup

Jun 12, 2009

Tightening vice

 

Saying that borrowing money without a balanced budget in place "would be irresponsible," Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger revoked a financial mechanism Thursday that he agreed to last year for seeking emergency loans," The Bee's Steve Wiegand reports.

 

"In a letter to state Controller John Chiang, the governor said he was rescinding his authorization for a General Cash Revolving Fund, which he had approved in April 2008.

 

The fund is legally necessary to enable the controller to borrow money on the commercial credit market through the issuance of Registered Anticipation Warrants, or RAWs. The warrants usually carry steep interest ratesand up-front fees, but would give the state more than a year to repay.

 

"I have informed legislative leaders that under no circumstances will I agree to issue a RAW to paper over our current  budget shortfall ," Schwarzenegger said. "This revocation ends any chance that the state could issue a RAW  and helps to clarify that our only alternative to running out of cash is to enact the budget solutions needed to restore the 2009-10 budget to balance."

 

The LAT's Shane Goldmacher reports. "Legislative Democrats reacted angrily Thursday to Schwarzenegger's statements.

"To threaten to shut down the state is, in the governor's own words, 'hallucinatory' and 'irresponsible,
' " said a visibly frustrated Assemblywoman Noreen Evans (D-Santa Rosa) during a session of the Legislature's joint budget committee, which she chairs.

"Come on, governor," said Sen. Mark Leno (D-San Francisco). "We can do it, and we can do it together. Don't put out there that it's not going to get done and we're going to collapse the world."

 

 

Jim Sanders picks up on the story of the fracturing Assembly Democratic caucus . "Bass sits squarely in the hot seat of an angry Democratic caucus that doesn't have its own plan for bridging the state's $24.3 billion budget gap and doesn't support Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's proposal.

 

"Interviews with a half-dozen Assembly Democrats, from party liberals to moderates, reveal a frustrated caucus thrashing about behind closed doors, often loudly, for consensus on fixing the budget.

 

"The 50-member caucus is split on how deeply to cut health, welfare and social service programs, how strongly to demand revenue-raising measures – and which taxes, fees or "creative" mechanisms to target for more funds."

 

Assemblyman Jared Huffman, D-San Rafael, conceded that the caucus feels a "huge amount of angst and pressure" over the state's massive shortfall. But the long hours of raucous debate are vital, and Bass remains firmly in charge, he said.

 

"Is her leadership threatened? Absolutely not," Huffman said.

 

"The fact that we're able to talk openly within our caucus, which hasn't always been the case, is I think a healthy thing," he said.

 

James Koren enters the "When is a reserve not a reserve?" debate between the governor's office and Darrell Steinberg. "

A budget plan that supporters said could prevent program cuts and a state raid on local funds is financially impossible, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's office said.
 

The plan, announced Tuesday by California Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, would have used a $4.5 billion reserve listed in the governor's proposed budget to pay for welfare, health care and college aid programs and prevented the state from borrowing $2 billion from local governments.

 

But the governor's office has said the reserve money is already spoken for.

 

"It's really not a 4.5 billion reserve," Schwarzenegger spokesman Aaron McLear said. "That money will be used to pay for programs in the budget."

 

John Myers says that while politicians like to say that crisis brings opportunity, this particular crisis has brought mostly confusion.

 

"As California's state budget fracas begins to heat up, it's getting awfully hard to sort through the numbers, data, and pitches that are being presented to prove particular points."

 

Lots of numbers and math ensue. Did we mention that we're writing this on our first cup of coffee?

 

This week's Capital Notes podcast focuses on, well, what else? The latest and greatest from budget land...

 

Josh Richman reports Caltrans contracts are being challenged in federal court.

 
"Caltrans' plan to set racial and gender quotas in federally funded road and highway contracts violates the state and federal constitutions, a federal lawsuit filed Thursday claims.

 

"Recent changes to the department's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program require that 6.75 percent of federally funded state road and highway contracts be awarded in a "race-conscious" manner. That encompasses small businesses owned by women as well as African-Americans, American Indians or Asian/Pacific Islander-Americans; it doesn't include businesses owned by white, Latino or certain other Asian-American men.

 

"This policy, according to the lawsuit filed in Sacramento by the Pacific Legal Foundation on behalf of the Associated General Contractors of America's San Diego Chapter, runs afoul of the state constitution as amended by Proposition 209 of 1996, which bars public institutions from considering race, sex or ethnicity in education, employment or contracting. It also violates the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment because there is no evidence of discrimination by Caltrans to justify a race-conscious remedy, the suit claims."

 

And we may have this one wrong, but something tells us a DA opening a probe into your office is not a good way to kick off your Assembly campaign.

 

The SGVT reports, "Police searched the homes of La Puente Mayor Louie Lujan and his election campaign treasurer for evidence of unreported contributions." 

 

Lujan had been a candidate to replace termed-out Assemblyman Ed Hernandez. 

 

 

 

 

 
Get the daily Roundup
free in your e-mail




The Roundup is a daily look at the news from the editors of Capitol Weekly and AroundTheCapitol.com.
Privacy Policy