The Roundup

Jan 6, 2009

Party on

"Capitol watchers ordinarily would prepare this week for Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's annual State of the State address, but the governor is delaying matters until a week from Thursday," reports Kevin Yamamura on Capitol Alert.

"Schwarzenegger aides aren't saying exactly why the governor has decided to move his annual address to Jan. 15, but speculation is that the governor may want to broker a midyear budget deal before he speaks to his fellow Californians. Perhaps it's better to have reached a partial budget solution than to explain that things in Sacramento are completely fouled up.

"Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg suggested Monday that a compromise could come together within "24 to 48 hours," though Schwarzenegger press secretary Aaron McLear insisted that talks have not improved since mid-December.

"Schwarzenegger is planning to formally transmit his budget plan Friday to the Legislature. His finance staff briefed reporters last week on his proposal to close a $40 billion state budget deficit."

 

Capitol Weekly's John Howard reports the governor is proposing to eliminate the Californa Conservation Corps. "The budget reductions, described by the administration as a $17 million "realignment," would result in the transfer of a myriad of CCC functions to the local groups, which rely heavily on volunteers. The locals' tasks include traditional environmental projects, such as tree-planting and trail-cutting, but the CCC also fights fires: In June, the CCC put some 90 crews on the fire lines.

 

"'I totally think this is a bad idea,' said Bruce Saito, a former CCC official now with the Los Angeles County conservation corps. 'We talk about economic stimulus packages, so we need to bring in and employ more young people, who historically face the toughest and most challenging obstacles.'

 

"Shifting functions to privately funded volunteer organizations is consistent with the Schwarzenegger administration's focus on volunteerism and makes fiscal sense, the administration said. But the elimination of the CCC and a strengthened policy on volunteerism won't hurt the government's ability to handle emergencies, including fires."

 

Speaking of volunteerism, "Meg Whitman, the former CEO of eBay, has resigned from three corporate boards, clearing the way for a 2010 run for California governor," writes the Bee's Shane Goldmacher.

"The 52-year-old Republican businesswoman departed the boards of eBay, Procter & Gamble and DreamWorks Animation SKG on Dec. 31, due to "personal reasons and time commitment," said her spokesman, Henry Gomez.

"She 'basically wanted to open her calendar to focus on other things,' Gomez said."

 

Hmmm...like what, we wonder...


"Whitman, a billionaire from her decade at eBay, has been making noise in the California political sphere for months.

"She was a senior adviser to Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain, traveled to the 2008 Republican National Convention with the California delegation, donated money ($150,000) to the state GOP, and is locked in a dispute with a cybersquatter over five political domain names such as whitmanforgovernor.com and meg2010.com.

"In preparation for her potential campaign, she has already secured a campaign strategist, Jeff Randle, a former adviser to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and ex-Gov. Pete Wilson."

 

AP takes it one step further and reports that Whitman "plans to run for governor of California."

 

What's the over-under on how much money will be spent in that Poizner vs. Whitman primary? 

 

Meanwhile, from our Leon Panetta Forward files, Barack Obama has tapped the former Congressman to be the country's top spy. But not everyone is pleased, reports the Chron's Matthew Stannard.

 

"The reported selection of Panetta, 70, who was White House chief of staff under President Bill Clinton and previously director of the Office of Management and Budget, caused a flurry of head-scratching among former intelligence operatives and policy analysts Monday, mainly because Panetta has no real experience in either intelligence or foreign policy, the bread-and-butter of the spy agency.

 

"'I was not informed about the selection of Leon Panetta to be the CIA director,' said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who will chair the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in the 111th Congress. 'My position has consistently been that I believe the agency is best served by having an intelligence professional in charge at this time.'"

 

"Democratic legislative leaders said Monday that California's $40 billion budget deficit will require the Legislature to sacrifice, but they declined to agree to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's proposal that they cut their budget by 10 percent," reports Aurelio Rojas in the Bee.

"The Republican governor last month ordered a 10 percent cut in state employees' salaries through furloughs and proposed the Legislature cut its budget by the same amount.

"On Monday, President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, said, 'We will certainly do the responsible thing, and we will share the pain.'

"'I don't know what form that will take yet,' Steinberg said before meeting with Assembly Speaker Karen Bass, D-Los Angeles.

"Asked if he would agree to the 10 percent budget cut proposed by Schwarzenegger, Steinberg said, 'I'm not committing to that because we're still discussing what we'll do.'"

 

And what about the governor? Maybe he'll cut his $1 salary to $0.90. Then we'll know he's serious...

 

In case you missed it over the holiday, Shane Goldmacher reports: "Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has appointed two former Republican Assembly members, Bonnie Garcia and George Plescia, to posts on the state's Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board."

Maybe he got a commitment from them to vote for the budget when they're elected to the Senate under a future gov.

 

The Bee's Dan Walters writes: "A convoluted and highly questionable scheme to generate billions of dollars for the state via local redevelopment agencies is being revived as Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and legislative leaders race with the calendar to close an enormous budget deficit.

"The proposal first surfaced during last summer's budget negotiations, pushed by a squad of lobbyists – most of them ex- legislators – for the City of Industry amid indications, which city officials denied, that it was aimed at building a new professional football stadium.

"It was not part of the budget enacted in September. But since then the deficit has ballooned to an estimated $40 billion over the next 18 months, and now some Republican legislators and those around the governor are intrigued by its potential for easing the need for tax increases and/or spending cuts.

"Under the deal now being weighed, the state would allow city redevelopment agencies to extend local redevelopment projects now scheduled to expire, without having to meet recently enacted reforms, including proving the existence of blight. In return, the redevelopment agencies would float bonds secured by property taxes on those extended projects and share the borrowed money with the state."

 

And before it's even enacted, Republicans are renewing their threat to challenge the Democrats' revenue package in the courts, the Bee's Phillip Reese reports.

 

"Any budget agreement between Democrats and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger that skirts the state's two-thirds vote requirement for new taxes will almost certainly be challenged in the courts – and there's a significant chance the state would lose, some legal experts said Monday.

 

"It's not a slam-dunk case for either side, though, law professors say, because the Legislature is largely moving into uncharted territory with its plans to break the budget stalemate by effectively replacing a tax that is tough to increase with a fee that is much simpler to boost.

 

"'The question is, 'What is a tax?' ' said Jesse Choper, Earl Warren Professor of Public Law at the University of California, Berkeley."

 

That's from Shakespeare, right?

 

"State Attorney General Jerry Brown was "profoundly wrong" and "invented an entirely new theory" when he urged the California Supreme Court to invalidate Proposition 8's same-sex marriage ban on the basis that voters can't be allowed to overturn fundamental liberties, attorneys for the measure said Monday," reports John Wildermuth in the Chron.

"Brown's reasoning would confer upon the state Supreme Court power it has never had, attorneys Kenneth Starr and Andrew Pugno said in their response to the attorney general's December brief.

"Brown "is inviting this court to declare a constitutional revolution," the attorneys argued in the 29-page response. 'His extra-constitutional vision is one of unprecedented judicial hegemony, a sweeping power vested in the least-democratic branch that overrides the precious right of the people to determine how they will be governed.'"

 

Meanwhile, in other Legal Beagle news:  "Rebellious congregations that part ways with their denominations may lose their church buildings and property as a result, the California Supreme Court said Monday in a unanimous ruling," report Maura Dolan and Duke Helfand in the Times.

"The state high court decision came in a case involving the Episcopal Church, but lawyers said it would apply to other denominations as well.

"Several Protestant denominations, including United Methodists and Presbyterians, have faced upheaval over gay rights issues. Monday's ruling, along with similar victories that the church leadership has won in other states, is expected to dampen enthusiasm for such separations.

"In a decision written by Justice Ming W. Chin, the court said the property of St. James Anglican Church in Newport Beach was owned by the national church, not the congregation. The congregation split away after the national church consecrated a gay man, V. Gene Robinson, as bishop of New Hampshire in 2003.

"'When it disaffiliated from the general church, the local church did not have the right to take the church property with it,' Chin wrote for the court."

 

And who knew that the Legislature has cleared the way for the death of public access television? The LAT's Reed Johnson, that's who.

 

"For decades, public access programming on cable television has provided a virtually free forum for community activists and aspiring entertainers, for preening star wannabes as well as serious-minded political watchdogs.

But in Los Angeles and across California that forum began crumbling last week, a development that advocates say will strip ordinary citizens of a valuable 1st Amendment platform.

A provision of a law passed by the Legislature in 2006, which took effect Thursday, allows cable television providers the option of dropping their long-standing obligation of providing free studios, equipment and training to the public. In return, providers must pay a substantial annual fee and continue to provide a minimal number of public education and government channels."

 

That makes us feel kinda funny, like when we used to climb the rope in gym class

 
Get the daily Roundup
free in your e-mail




The Roundup is a daily look at the news from the editors of Capitol Weekly and AroundTheCapitol.com.
Privacy Policy