Days of Wine and Roses

Mar 9, 2009

"In the midst of intense state budget negotiations, Democratic lawmakers stole away to an elegant wine-country lodge where the gourmet meals, rooms and cocktails were provided by a trio of interests with much at stake in the Capitol," report Patrick McGreevy and Eric Bailey for the Times.

By "wine country," they mean Lodi, which is actually a suburb of America's second most miserable city.

 

"Soon after the trial lawyers and the unions representing firefighters and carpenters covered the $14,000 tab, their agendas advanced in Sacramento.

"Such getaways for lawmakers are commonly bankrolled by groups with business before the state, often while that business is pending.

"'This is an unending problem in Sacramento, where lobbying groups bring politicians somewhere to wine and dine them,' said Doug Heller, executive director of the group Consumer Watchdog. 'No matter who they represent, groups think that's the way you play the game.'

"The December expenditures were disclosed last week in documents filed by lawmakers, who also reported that various other interests provided them with tens of thousands of dollars' worth of dinners, overseas travel and tickets to Disneyland, Dodger baseball games, rock concerts and golf tournaments.

"The two-day retreat was convened at the Wine and Roses hotel and spa in Lodi a day after Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger declared a fiscal emergency and ordered the Legislature to meet on a series of proposals to plug a projected $42-billion budget gap. The Consumer Attorneys of California, California Professional Firefighters and Northern California Carpenters Regional Council picked up the tab."

 

The U-T's John Maurelius takes his turn covering the angst of groups looking at the May 19 ballot measures.

"The governor and Democratic legislative leaders also crafted the measures, Propositions 1A through 1F, with sweeteners designed to make painful tax increases and spending cuts easier for voters to swallow and, perhaps more important, to neutralize opposition from the state's powerful public employees unions.

"'There's something in there for everybody to love and everybody to hate,' said Tim Hodson, director of the Center for California Studies at Sacramento State University.

"Even if the unions don't enthusiastically support the special election measures, analysts say keeping them on the sidelines is crucial.

"'Ballot initiatives almost never pass when big money is spent against them, especially complicated initiatives like this package,' said Dan Schnur, director of the Jesse M. Unruh Institute of Politics at the University of Southern California. 'As long as Schwarzenegger has the only megaphone in the debate, he's going to win. But if the 'no' side raises a good bit of money, it gets much more difficult.'

"Unlike in 2005, the unions are biding their time in deciding what to do.

"'All of our unions are in the process of taking a careful look at the ballot initiatives,' said Steve Smith, communications director for the California Labor Federation. 'People want to be deliberate and want to take the time to figure out if they want to mount a campaign and, if they do, what it's going to look like.'"

 

Enquiring campaign consultants want to know...

 

Speaking of the ballot measures, the Bee's Steve Weigand notes: "As California's Legislature has grown more stridently partisan and its two-thirds approval requirement on budgets and tax-increase bills grows increasingly difficult to secure, the time-honored game of political logrolling has evolved to much higher stakes." 


"And if the 2009 version is any indication, the new way is here to stay.

"'Logrolling' is a term of political art that refers to what is usually quietly conducted horse-trading among lawmakers: You back my agenda, I back yours.

"But as legislators have become entrenched in partisan camps, said Tim Hodson, a former legislative staffer who is director of the Center for California Studies at California State University, Sacramento, budget negotiators must persuade the minority party caucuses "to allow their sacrificial lambs to vote for the budget."

"That means the "lambs" are likely to have loftier demands in return for their votes.

"'As long as you are dealing with a situation where legislators are more afraid of bolting their own caucus than of any benefits they can get for their vote,' Hodson said, 'the (logrolling) requests are likely to be more global than in the past.'"

 

The U-T's James Sweeney looks at the corporate tax break added as a budget sweetener, which is taking heat from liberal groups including the California Budget Project's Jean Ross.

 

"What's particularly troubling about California's revision, Ross argued, 'is it says you can have it your way. Calculate your taxes based on the old formula. Calculate your taxes based on the new formula . . . and send us the lower number.'"

 

Jim Miller takes a look at some of the new spending proposals that have been introduced in the Legislature.

 

"Within days of voting to close a $40 billion budget gap, California lawmakers introduced hundreds of bills that could cost the state money if they pass.

 

"The legislation would create new programs, expand existing ones or make additional demands on state and local government. Some bills would reduce revenue.

 

"Among the bills is a proposal that would require the state to craft regulations for sleep-disorder technicians. Another bill would require the state to conduct an awareness campaign about pregnancy and post-birth mood and anxiety disorders. And one would establish a vision-care program for retired state employees."

 

The Bee's Peter Hecht reports that two federal courts may this week resolve the fight between tribal casinos and chartiable bingo parlors over electronic bingo games.

 

"California tribal casino representatives warn that the state risks losing tens of millions of dollars in tribal revenue-sharing payments if authorities can't shut down charitable bingo parlors that operate casino-style machines."

"A new law intended to ban electronic bingo games used by many charities went into effect Jan. 1.

"But several bingo parlors in Sacramento and elsewhere have continued operating the machines under a court injunction that stopped state and county authorities from shutting down the games."

 

George Skelton looks at Darrell Steinberg's push for career technical education, which has found bipartisan support.

 

"So what's stopping everyone? Money. The state's still broke.

"It reminds me of what my mom used to tell us kids as we loaded our plates: Make sure your eyes aren't bigger than your stomachs.

"Maybe a little career tech; easy on everything else."

 

Dan Walters looks at a recent decision by the Workers Comp Appeals Board that some say has gutted the workers' comp 2004 overhaul .

"The decision, in merged cases of a truck driver and a school secretary, declares that the AMA guidelines can be sidestepped if following them "would result in a permanent disability award that would be inequitable, disproportionate, and not a fair and accurate measure of the employee's permanent disability."

"Business and employer groups are fuming that the board is ignoring the wording and intent of the 2004 law. The case is probably headed to the courts for a final disposition. But the WCAB decision is a rare piece of good news for groups representing or treating impaired workers that have chafed for a half-decade.

"Perhaps the WCAB's members know their unanimous decision probably doesn't comport with the law as written, but are sending a message to the administration that the implementing rules are too tough on workers with legitimate disability claims and should be revised. The administration had once promised a re-examination of the law's effects but apparently has never delivered it.

"In the meantime, the WCAB decision has thrown countless pending workers' comp cases into turmoil, with the hearing officers, physicians, workers' attorneys and those representing insurers and employers trying to figure out how much additional leeway they have in rating disability claims."

 

Meanwhile, more bad news for the parent company of the Sacramento Bee. AP reports, "Newspaper publisher McClatchy Co. said Monday that it plans to eliminate 1,600 jobs, or 15 percent of its work force, as it contends with declining revenue and a deepening recession.

 

"The cost-control efforts come as McClatchy is faced with plunging ad revenues plaguing the entire publishing sector, as well as trying to recover $5.3 million owed by newspapers it had sold to companies that have recently filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

McClatchy also has its own debt worries. The company owed about $2.04 billion as of the end of 2008, stemming mainly from its 2006 acquisition of the Knight Ridder newspaper chain."

 

And finally, from our Lunatic Ninja Files, "When a dark intruder smashed through his bedroom window and repeatedly bounced on his bed, Beat Ettlin at first was relieved to discover it was a kangaroo.

 

"My initial thought when I was half awake was, 'It's a lunatic ninja coming through the window,'" the 42-year-old told The Associated Press on Monday. "It seems about as likely as a kangaroo breaking in."

 

But his relief was short-lived. As Ettlin cowered beneath the sheets with his wife and 9-year-old daughter at 2 a.m. Sunday, the frantic kangaroo bounded into the bedroom of his 10-year-old son Leighton Beman, who screamed, "There's a 'roo in my room!"

 

"Ettlin, a chef originally from the Swiss city of Stans, said he jumped the 90 pound (40 kilogram) marsupial from behind and pinned it to the floor. He grabbed it in a headlock and wrestled the trashing and bleeding intruder into a hallway, toward the front door.

He used a single, fumbling hand to open the front door and shoved the kangaroo into the night.


 
Get the daily Roundup
free in your e-mail




The Roundup is a daily look at the news from the editors of Capitol Weekly and AroundTheCapitol.com.
Privacy Policy