Into the unknown

Jun 22, 2011

In a remarkable decision fraught with political peril, state Controller John Chiang stopped pay checks for California lawmakers until they approve a balanced budget. The unexpected move, which Chiang said he made on his own authority after reviewing the vetoed spending plan that legislators produced last week, raised constitutional issues and gave Gov. Brown some dramatic political cover.

 

From John Howard in Capitol Weekly: "State Controller John Chiang, citing his authority as the state’s fiscal steward and an “honest broker of numbers,” has halted lawmakers’ pay, saying the budget they approved last week was $1.85 billion out whack and incomplete. At least one angry Democrat said the move marked an unconstitutional interference in the legislative branch of government."

 

"His decision, remarkable for its political and policy implications, stemmed from his review of the spending plan that Brown vetoed on June 16, a day after it was passed.  His action, Chiang said, stemmed from his own fiscal analysis and not the voters' desire to dock legislators' pay for missing budget deadlines."

 

“My office’s careful review of the recently-passed budget found components that were miscalculated, miscounted or unfinished,”  Chiang said in a written statement. “The numbers simply did not add up, and the Legislature will forfeit their pay until a balanced budget is sent to the Governor.”

 

"Senate Leader Darrell Steinberg said Chiang's decision "sets a dangerous precedent. The impact on legislative members is real, but it pales in comparison to the impact on school children, the elderly, and the men and women who protect our safety. This decision will not change our commitment and obligation to stand for the people we represent.”

 

In step two of the political tap dance, the Democratic governor has drafted a new budget that makes an end-run around Republicans. He said he'll present the new plan on Wednesday.

 

From Mike Marois and James Nash in Bloomberg: "Brown’s proposal comes as legislators have been forced to forfeit pay for every day they fail to send a balanced budget to the governor past a June 15 deadline. He vetoed a spending plan sent to him by Democrats last week, saying it used legally doubtful maneuvers and one-time fixes."

 

“I’ll be sharing some very specific ideas tomorrow,” Brown said to reporters as he left a meeting with Assembly Democrats yesterday. “There will be several ideas I’ll propose.”

 

"Brown, a 73-year-old Democrat, and lawmakers are at an impasse over how to bridge a $10 billion deficit. Without a budget, the biggest issuer of municipal debt in the U.S. is unable to borrow on Wall Street to pay bills when the fiscal year starts July 1."

 

"Brown’s plan would need only a simple majority to pass, according to two legislative aides apprised of what the governor told Democrats. The aides declined to be identified because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly about the meetings."

 

Meanwhile, speaking of the budget, the fate of California's redevelopment agencies -- remember them? -- remained uncertain, despite months of wrangling. The governor wanted to abolish them, but a compromise remains on the table. Sean Maher in the Oakland Tribune has the story.

 

"The state Senate and Assembly passed two bills June 15: The first would eliminate redevelopment agencies -- there are about 400 statewide -- as soon as Oct. 1. The second would allow the agencies to remain as long as they pay a share of the $1.7 billion the state would save if they were eliminated entirely."

 

"The contributions range wildly in size across the state. Berkeley would have to pay about $400,000, while Los Angeles' share would be almost $100 million."

 

"Most East Bay cities would face payments between $4 million and $13 million. Those include Fremont at $9 million; Hayward at $4 million; Concord at $6.2 million, Alameda at $5.2 million; Emeryville at $13.2 million; and Richmond at $10.4 million."

 

"In Oakland, that share is estimated at almost $40 million, a massive hit as the city tries to close a $56 million deficit already expected to decimate several public services."

 

Across the country, there is a surge in local and state recall elections, fueled in part by an expanding use of social media.

 

From the LA Times' Nichols Riccardi: "The number of mayors who faced recalls doubled in 2010 from the previous year, the U.S. Conference of Mayors said. Anti-tax activists even tried to recall two Democratic U.S. senators last year, only to be shot down by courts, which noted that there are no provisions for recalls in federal law."


"Joshua Spivak, who studies recalls and blogs about them at recallelections.blogspot.com, said there had been only 20 attempted recalls of state legislators in U.S. history. This year, 10 are already on the ballot. Much of that is because of an unprecedented outbreak of recalls in Wisconsin, where the newly elected Republican governor's proposal to limit the power of unions led to recalls against six Republican state senators who voted for the bill, and three Democrats who left the state to try to stop its passage."

"Spivak said he thought recall attempts could increase along the lines of their electoral sibling, ballot initiatives, which once were rare but since the 1970s have been a fixture on election day. Recalls may end up the same way, he said."

 

And from our "So You Think Your Health Insurance is Bad" file, comes the tale of the bank robber who took $1 -- and then waited for police to arrive. He said he wanted to go into custody so he could get medical care.

 

""(This is the) first time I've ever been in trouble with the law,” James Verone said from the Gaston County Jail on Friday. “I'm sort of a logical person and that was my logic. (That was) what I came up with.”

 

"That is how Verone said he came to the decision to rob the RBC bank on New Hope Road on Thursday, June 9."

 

"He didn’t have a gun and he handed the teller a rather unusual note."

 

"The note said ‘This is a bank robbery. Please only give me one dollar,’" Verone said."

 

"Then he did the strangest thing of all."

 

"I started to walk away from the teller, then I went back and said, 'I'll be sitting right over there in the chair waiting for the police," Verone said.