Saying that borrowing money without a balanced budget
in place "would be irresponsible," Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger revoked a financial mechanism Thursday that he agreed
to last year for seeking emergency loans," The Bee's Steve Wiegand reports.
"In a letter to state Controller John Chiang, the governor said he was rescinding his authorization
for a General Cash Revolving Fund, which he had approved
in April 2008.
The
fund is legally necessary to enable the controller
to borrow money on
the commercial credit market through the issuance of
Registered
Anticipation Warrants, or RAWs. The warrants usually
carry steep interest ratesand up-front fees, but would give the state more than a year
to repay.
"I have informed legislative leaders that under no circumstances
will I agree to issue a RAW to paper over our current
budget shortfall ," Schwarzenegger said. "This revocation ends any chance that the state could
issue a RAW
and helps to clarify that our only alternative to running
out of cash
is to enact the budget solutions needed to restore
the 2009-10 budget
to balance."
The LAT's Shane Goldmacher reports. "Legislative Democrats reacted angrily Thursday to Schwarzenegger's statements.
"To threaten to shut down the state is, in the governor's own words,
'hallucinatory' and 'irresponsible,
' " said a visibly frustrated
Assemblywoman Noreen Evans (D-Santa Rosa) during a session of the
Legislature's joint budget committee, which she chairs.
"Come on, governor," said Sen. Mark Leno (D-San Francisco). "We can do
it, and we can do it together. Don't put out there that it's not going
to get done and we're going to collapse the world."
Jim Sanders picks up on the story of the fracturing Assembly Democratic caucus . "Bass sits squarely in the hot seat of an angry Democratic
caucus that
doesn't have its own plan for bridging the state's $24.3 billion budget
gap and doesn't support Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's proposal.
"Interviews with a half-dozen Assembly
Democrats, from party liberals to moderates, reveal
a frustrated caucus
thrashing about behind closed doors, often loudly,
for consensus on
fixing the budget.
"The 50-member caucus is split on how deeply to
cut health, welfare and social service programs, how
strongly to demand
revenue-raising measures – and which taxes, fees or "creative"
mechanisms to target for more funds."
Assemblyman Jared Huffman, D-San Rafael,
conceded that the caucus feels a "huge amount of angst and pressure"
over the state's massive shortfall. But the long hours of raucous
debate are vital, and Bass remains firmly in charge,
he said.
"Is her leadership threatened? Absolutely not," Huffman said.
"The
fact that we're able to talk openly within our caucus, which hasn't
always been the case, is I think a healthy thing," he said.
James Koren enters the "When is a reserve not a reserve?" debate between the governor's office and Darrell Steinberg. "
A
budget plan that supporters said could prevent program
cuts and a state
raid on local funds is financially impossible, Gov.
Arnold
Schwarzenegger's office said.
The plan, announced Tuesday by California Senate President
Pro
Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, would have used a $4.5 billion
reserve listed in the governor's proposed budget to pay for welfare,
health care and college aid programs and prevented
the state from
borrowing $2 billion from local governments.
But the governor's office has said the reserve money is already spoken
for.
"It's
really not a 4.5 billion reserve," Schwarzenegger spokesman Aaron
McLear said. "That money will be used to pay for programs in the
budget."
John Myers says that while politicians like to say
that crisis brings opportunity, this particular crisis has brought mostly confusion.
"As California's state budget fracas begins to heat up, it's getting
awfully hard to sort through the numbers, data, and
pitches that are
being presented to prove particular points."
Lots of numbers and math ensue. Did we mention that
we're writing this on our first cup of coffee?
This week's Capital Notes podcast focuses on, well, what else? The latest and greatest
from budget land...
Josh Richman reports Caltrans contracts are being challenged in federal
court.
"Caltrans'
plan to set racial and gender quotas in federally funded
road and
highway contracts violates the state and federal constitutions,
a
federal lawsuit filed Thursday claims.
"Recent changes to the
department's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program require
that
6.75 percent of federally funded state road and highway
contracts be
awarded in a "race-conscious" manner. That encompasses small businesses
owned by women as well as African-Americans, American Indians or
Asian/Pacific Islander-Americans; it doesn't include businesses owned
by white, Latino or certain other Asian-American men.
"This
policy, according to the lawsuit filed in Sacramento
by the Pacific
Legal Foundation on behalf of the Associated General
Contractors of
America's San Diego Chapter, runs afoul of the state constitution
as
amended by Proposition 209 of 1996, which bars public institutions from
considering race, sex or ethnicity in education, employment
or
contracting. It also violates the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment
because there is no evidence of discrimination by Caltrans
to justify a
race-conscious remedy, the suit claims."
And we may have this one wrong, but something tells
us a DA opening a probe into your office is not a good
way to kick off your Assembly campaign.
The SGVT reports, "Police searched the homes of La Puente Mayor Louie Lujan and his
election campaign treasurer for evidence of unreported
contributions."
Lujan had been a candidate to replace termed-out Assemblyman Ed Hernandez.